Labor & Economy
Lawsuit: Los Angeles Overcharges Poor Probationers
Former jail and prison inmates say they have been charged excessive amounts for the cost of probation, which they can never repay.
The Los Angeles County Department of Probation is overcharging probationers from county jails and state prisons with fines and fees they canât afford, while the Board of Supervisors directs the cash into county coffers before compensating victims, according to a lawsuit filed September 20 by a grassroots group of formerly incarcerated Angelenos.
At the legal clinic run by A New Way of Life, a Los Angeles-based nonprofit that provides shelter and services to formerly incarcerated women and their children, attorneys noticed a concerning pattern.
Community members who served jail or prison time persistently told attorneys that they âwere being charged excessive amounts for the cost of probation, amounts that they couldnât ever hope to repay,â said C.T. Turney-Lewis, the groupâs supervising staff attorney. Oftentimes, they âhave no income and were leaving probation with thousands and thousands of dollars in outstanding costs.â
A New Way of Lifeâs litigation team set out to examine how Los Angelesâ probation department calculates and charges its fees, and how the Board of Supervisors handles that money once it comes in. The groupâs attorneys allege that the agency and governing body are violating state law by charging indigent probationers in excess of what they can afford, coercing some to waive their right to a hearing in which their ability to pay could be evaluated and by using that money to pay off probation costs without prioritizing victim restitution and other fines and fees as mandated. (When California courts order defendants to monetarily compensate their victims, these payments are channeled through county offices like the probation department. Victim restitution is meant to be paid in full before departments move on to other costs, according to state law.)
A New Way of Life sent a letter to the department and the board last month demanding policy changes and remedies for these alleged violations. It has now taken legal action alongside the Social Justice Law Project on behalf of the Los Angeles Chapter of All of Us or None, an advocacy group run by formerly incarcerated people that is affiliated with A New Way of Life, and SaĂșl Sarabia, chair of the Los Angeles County Probation Reform and Implementation Team. Sarabia leads the initiative to reform and develop oversight for the Department of Probation.
Representatives from the probation department and Board of Supervisors told Capital & Main that they could not comment on pending litigation. However, the board decided in April to âexamine the application of fines, fees, and penalties, and determine the feasibility of eliminating some or all of these fines.â Supervisor Sheila Kuehl said at the time that âthese fees do more harm than good [and] trap people sentenced for crimes, and their families, in an endless spiral of debt,â with disproportionate impact on communities of color.
The criminal justice-related fees assessed by California counties are among the highest in the country, with Los Angeles topping the list, according to a study by the Western Center on Law & Poverty, an advocacy group of legal scholars. Juveniles were once also subject to these fees, until the practice was eliminated in Los Angeles in 2009 and across the state in 2017. Los Angeles County then went a step further and wiped out $89 million in debt owed by juveniles.
There is now movement in California to eliminate these fines and fees altogether. San Francisco and neighboring Alameda County did so last year, eliminating more than $70 million in debt across the two counties. The California Senate is currently considering legislation that would do at the state level what was done in these northern counties.
Anthony Robles, an organizer with the nonprofit Los Angeles Youth Justice Coalition, knows firsthand what itâs like to face fines and fees that are impossible to pay. When he was released from incarceration he didnât have a job or cash on hand. He relied on welfare and food stamps and couldnât get a full-time job due to his felony conviction and the fact that heâd started taking classes at a community college.
âProbation still charged me $50 per month for their so-called services. My total for the three years was $4,000. I couldnât pay it,â Robles said at a September 20 press conference held outside of the Los Angeles County Department of Probation in Downey.
When he didnât make his payments, he received a letter warning him that he could be rearrested for violating his probation. A hearing was held to evaluate his finances, and the court determined that he could afford to pay half of that amount.
âEach month I would have to scrape up $25, even though I had almost nothing to my name,â Robles said. He was sleeping on the couch in his grandmotherâs apartment and struggling to get by. He paid up to avoid violating probation but said the department didnât provide him with any services in return to help him find housing, get a job and land back on his feet. âThatâs just a testament to the ineffectiveness of probation.â
Copyright Capital & Main
-
Column - State of InequalityMay 21, 2026In California Governorâs Race, Xavier Becerra Walks Away From Single-Payer
-
Deadly Dust: The Silicosis EpidemicMay 6, 2026California Could Be the First State to Ban Quartz Countertops
-
Latest NewsMay 5, 2026Fire Recovery Could Wipe Out Altadenaâs Affordable Rentals
-
Latest NewsMay 11, 2026Inside the Texas Water Crisis Pitting Residents Against Industry
-
Column - State of InequalityMay 7, 2026California Lawmaker Proposes Fix to Blunt Loss of Food and Health Aid
-
Latest NewsMay 8, 2026Salvadoran Man Says He Suffered Stroke While Awaiting Deportation to Torture Prison
-
Featured VideoMay 8, 2026The Lung Disease That’s Killing California Stonecutters
-
Latest NewsMay 15, 2026California Hazardous Waste Rules Criticized as Years Late and âPolluter-Friendlyâ

