Politics & Government
Wisconsin: Buying Democracy, One Vote at a Time

Here’s a headline you won’t see, but should: “Scott Walker Spent 88 percent of the Money to Get 53 Percent of the Vote.”
Political pundits will spend the next few days and weeks analyzing the Wisconsin recall election, examining exit polls, spilling lots of ink over how different demographic groups — income, race, religious, union membership, gender, party affiliation, independents, liberals/conservatives/
But the real winner in Wisconsin on Tuesday was not Gov. Scott Walker, but Big Money. And the real loser was not Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett, but democracy.
Walker’s Republican campaign outspent Barrett’s Democratic campaign by $30.5 million to $4 million — that’s a 7.5 to 1 advantage. Another way of saying this is that of the $34.5 million spent on their campaigns, Walker spend 88 percent of the money.
Walker beat Barrett by 1,316,989 votes to 1,145,190 votes — 53 percent to 46 percent (with 1 percent going to an independent candidate).
Here’s another way of saying that: Walker spent $23 for each vote he received, while Barrett spent only $3.47 per vote.
But the reality is even worse than this, because the $34.5 million figure does not include so-called independent expenditures and issue ads paid for primarily by out-of-state billionaires (like the Koch brothers, Sheldon Adelson, and Joe Rickets), business groups, and the National Rifle Association, which were skewed even more heavily toward Walker. Once all this additional spending is calculated, we’ll see that total spending in this race could be more than double the $34.5 million number, that Walker and his business allies outspent Barrett by an even wider margin, and that he had to spend even more than $23 for each vote.
In other words, business and billionaires bought this election for Walker. The money paid for non-stop TV and radio ads as well as mailers. There’s no doubt that if the Barrett campaign had even one-third of the war- chest that Walker had, it would have been able to mount an even more formidable grassroots get-out-the-vote campaign and put more money into the TV and radio air war. Under those circumstances, it is likely that Barrett would have prevailed.
Pundits can have a field day pontificating about the Wisconsin election, but in the end its about how Big Money hijacked democracy in the Badger State on Tuesday, and how they’re trying to do it again in November.

-
Column - California UncoveredMay 5, 2025
How Did Farmers Respond When the Trump Administration Suddenly Stopped Paying Them to Help Feed Needy Californians?
-
Latest NewsMay 5, 2025
Kaiser and Mental Health Care Workers Reach Tentative Agreement
-
Column - State of InequalityMay 15, 2025
Innovative Medi-Cal Expansion Threatened by Budget and Trump Pressures
-
The SlickMay 12, 2025
Push to Make Big Oil Pay for Climate Damage Losing Steam in California Legislature
-
Featured VideoMay 15, 2025
A League of Her Own: Transgender Athlete AB Hernandez Faces Down Hecklers
-
The SlickMay 8, 2025
Solar Grants Held Hostage in Pennsylvania Legislature — as Demand Soars
-
Latest NewsMay 9, 2025
‘We Are in a Moment of Unparalleled Peril’: An Interview With Naomi Klein
-
Column - State of InequalityMay 22, 2025
The Great Food Bank Robbery: Hungry Californians Face Losing Their Daily Bread