The Slick
Like It Or Not, a Hydrogen Ecosystem Is Coming to New Mexico
Production, distribution, power generation, carbon capture all in the works: Questions, concerns, confusion abound.
Over the past month, in public meetings stretching from the Navajo Nation to Albuquerque, public officials and company representatives unveiled a picture of a new hydrogen energy industry being built in the northwest corner of New Mexico. The presentations reveal hydrogen production, transportation, power generation and carbon sequestration projects arcing across the Navajo Nation to Farmington and down to the I-40 corridor between Gallup and Albuquerque. Most of the projects are underway, and itâs clear theyâll rely on fossil fuels.
Â
Join our email list to get the stories that mainstream news is overlooking.
Sign up for Capital & Mainâs newsletter.
Â
Tallgrass Energy sits at the center of all this activity and has the backing of the stateâs biggest political player, New Mexicoâs governor. The Denver-based company operates more than 7,000 miles of natural gas pipelines stretching from Oregon to Ohio, and itâs going all-in on creating the necessary pieces of a new economic base in New Mexicoâs second-largest fossil fuel producing region. The regionâs natural gas holds the key to many of the projects
“Hydrogen is huge!â Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham proclaimed while speaking at an event in Farmington in April. What came next is what many in the region fear.
âHydrogen uses the natural gas resources here we donât know what to do with,â she said.Â
Actually, plenty of people know what to do with natural gas. The issue is that fewer and fewer people want to use it, even as more and more of it is being produced. Historically, natural gas has been used most significantly for electrical grid power generation in the U.S., but its use in that arena is declining as renewable energy prices drop in the face of government climate policies and ever-cheaper solar technology.
Â
It takes more energy to make hydrogen than it provides when converted to useful energy.
Â
Meanwhile, natural gas prices have tanked due to a production glut caused by ever-increasing oil production using hydraulic fracturing, or âfracking,â in places like the Permian Basin, shared between New Mexico and Texas. Producers want the oil, which brings a market price well above the cost of its production. But, pulled from the well, that fracked oil comes commingled with the less desired natural gas. Over the past month, natural gas prices dipped below zero at a main pipeline transit hub in Texas due to the glut. Some companies are storing gas underground, awaiting better days and prices.
Enter hydrogen. The most plentiful element in the universe is a perfectly clean fuel when used to make electricity in a fuel cell. Itâs generally cleaner than natural gas when burned to make heat, though the process produces nitrogen oxides that the EPA says damage the human respiratory system and contribute to acid rain.Â
The crux lies in how you make your hydrogen, which rarely exists on its own on earth. The cleanest, most energy-intensive way breaks water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen using renewable energy. The common way breaks off hydrogen atoms from the methane in natural gas. Either way, it takes more energy to make hydrogen than it provides when converted to useful energy. When made with natural gas, the process also produces a lot of climate-damaging carbon dioxide. That defeats hydrogenâs clean bonafides unless the carbon dioxide is captured and buried underground, a process that uses even more energy.
Furthermore, the natural gas production and transportation process often leaks, sometimes a lot. That gas is mostly methane, which is 80 times more capable of warming the atmosphere than carbon dioxide in the first 20 years after itâs released.Â
The federal government incentivized so-called low-carbon hydrogen production from natural gas with carbon sequestration in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. Many worry that this will lead to increased greenhouse gas emissions in light of New Mexicoâs rocky track record of policing its oil and gas producers. All of this means a fuel promoted to fight climate change could actually exacerbate it, and cost a lot, too.
âHow companies choose to produce that hydrogen will fundamentally be a business decision they must make,â said Michael Coleman, director of communications to Gov. Lujan Grisham. âOur greatest opportunity as a state is producing hydrogen from a range of feedstocks.â
Gov. Lujan Grisham has stumped for hydrogen for years, with little support from the stateâs Legislature or environmental groups. She also sought a multibillion-dollar grant from the federal government to create a multi-state hydrogen ecosystem centered in New Mexicoâs San Juan Basin, but the feds snubbed it last October. Hydrogen investments face a bumpy road in other states as well.Â
Nonetheless, Lujan Grisham forges on â she went to the Netherlands last week to drum up more hydrogen investments. Meanwhile, testing and planning chug along, with Tallgrass linking many of the far-flung pieces together. âThe governor is looking to attract all kinds of hydrogen businesses to New Mexico,â Coleman said. âTallgrassâ proposal draws all of the attention because of its scale but is hardly the only initiative under way.â
Â
The Navajo Nation has a 100-year history of outside companies coming in, making fortunes from Native resources and leaving environmental messes behind.Â
Â
âOne of the more notable misconceptions that weâve struggled to overcome is the view that we are focused on a singular point-to-point hydrogen project,â said Steven Davidson, vice president of government and public affairs for Tallgrass Energy. Heâs referring to a hydrogen pipeline being developed by GreenView, a Tallgrass subsidiary. âWe are working to create a clean energy ecosystem in coordination with many other parties,â he said.
One of those parties is the Four Corners Clean Energy Alliance, an advocacy group promoting hydrogen development and associated technologies in the region on behalf of GreenView and Tallgrass. One of the groupâs board members is an executive at Tallgrass. Both the groupâs interim director and director of communications also work for the Consumer Energy Alliance, an industry trade group sponsored in part by a whoâs-who of fossil fuel energy producers.
The Tallgrass ecosystem includes a carbon capture and sequestration project with New Mexico Tech. The university has been studying the geology of the San Juan Basin since 2020 with the goal of getting three sequestration wells operational in a few years. The project is in the middle of its federal permitting process and could be approved sometime next year.
It also includes the Escalante coal-fired power plant retrofitted to burn hydrogen, along I-40 between Albuquerque and Gallup and the hydrogen pipeline linking Farmington to central Arizona and crossing the Navajo Nation, a controversial project still in the planning stages.
Itâs expected to include a hydrogen production facility or two in or near Farmington, with exact locations to be determined.
And thereâs more. At a San Juan County Commission meeting in April, the lead researcher on the carbon sequestration project pointed out that if the Escalante power plant is to reach its carbon-free objective, Tallgrass has to build another pipeline, this one for carbon dioxide, running from the Escalante power plant to the future carbon sequestration wells, roughly 100 miles to the north and crossing the eastern reaches of the Navajo Nation.
Meanwhile, the hydrogen pipeline project has already drawn fire from Navajo opposed to further energy projects on the Nation. The tribe has a 100-year history of outside companies coming in, making fortunes from Native resources and leaving environmental messes behind.Â
âAll the projects that have ever been on Navajo [Nation] made those companies a lot of money,â said Jessica Keetso, who is DinĂ© and an organizer with TĂł NizhĂłnĂ ĂnĂ or Sacred Water Speaks, a Navajo water rights and environmental protection group. Historically, she said, they donât clean up after themselves. âThey get away with not doing reclamation, for everything from oil and gas, uranium to coal,â she said.
Â
âWill this really kickstart our economy, our Navajo Nation economy? I think that’s questionable. If 50 years of coal mining couldn’t do that, hydrogen is not going to do that.â
~ Jessica Keetso, organizer, TĂł NizhĂłnĂ ĂnĂ
Â
Many are also unhappy with how Tallgrass has gone about drumming up support from the tribeâs widely spaced, often-impoverished population.Â
At a meeting of the Navajo Nation Resources and Development Committee in Albuquerque in late April to discuss the hydrogen pipeline project, committee member Rickie Nez told Tallgrass representatives, âNo more gift cards! No more gift cards! It makes you look like youâre bribing someone.âÂ
GreenView representatives had been giving out gift cards to tribal members who attended chapter house meetings where the pipeline was discussed. (Chapter houses are the most local form of government on the Navajo Nation.) At some meetings, tribal members also voted on resolutions to allow the pipeline to cross their chapters. Davidson said the company came up with the idea âin consultation with respected cultural advisors from the Navajo Nation ⊠to lessen the burden to the individual to encourage them to participate.â He said that the cards were for $25 to $50. He also heard that the cards âmet with some concern about optics. We completely understand that point.â
In addition, at the Resources and Development Committee meeting, Adam Schiche, whose online profile says he is the vice president for international business development at Tallgrass, said that GreenView representatives met with and paid individual grazing permit holders $500 for the possibility of working on land where livestock grazes. Davidson later said, âWe have no qualmsâ in offering upfront payments, treating Navajo permit holders âexactly like landowners off the Nation.â He said further money would be given if the project goes forward.
âMoney talks. Money is persuading people, which is a very sad thing to see,â said Keetso. âThe tactics are actually paying off for them because two months ago they didnât have any resolutions.â
For roughly two years, representatives from both TĂł NizhĂłnĂ ĂnĂ and GreenView have made their cases for or against the pipeline and asked chapters to consider resolutions supporting or opposing it all along the proposed pipeline route. At the April Resources and Development Committee hearing, Schiche said that Tallgrass representatives had gathered resolutions in favor of the pipeline from five chapters. TĂł NizhĂłnĂ ĂnĂ has gathered 15 against.
Tallgrassâ main business is natural gas, and while the focus on hydrogen is touted as part of a climate change solution, itâs clearly connected to those fossil fuel operations. âWe believe every practical option to decarbonize should be advanced â including the decarbonization of natural gas to make ⊠hydrogen,â Davidson said. He sees hydrogen keeping the lights on, firing power plants when the sun goes down and the winds calm. âHydrogen is a proven way to convert and store that clean electricity for when itâs needed,â he said. Thatâs the idea that ties natural gas to carbon sequestration, to the Escalante hydrogen-fired power plant 100 miles west of Albuquerque and to a 200-mile pipeline across the Navajo Nation to central Arizona.
Powering the electric grid with expensive hydrogen isnât universally popular. The Rocky Mountain Institute, a Colorado-based nonprofit that helps businesses and governments transition away from fossil fuels, promotes a common view for hydrogenâs best uses. âFertilizer, oil refining and petrochemicals, steel manufacturing, and long-distance heavy-duty transport are no-regrets applications of hydrogen today,â they write. Hydrogen power plants arenât whatâs needed now.
In the end, New Mexicoâs discussion about hydrogen is about money. At the Resource and Development Committee meeting, Schiche told the group that $400,000 a year would be split among chapter houses along the pipeline route. In addition, the Nation could choose either a percentage stake in the pipeline company or annual payment for gas moving through the line.Â
âWill this really kickstart our economy, our Navajo Nation economy?â Keetso said later. âI think that’s questionable. If 50 years of coal mining couldn’t do that, hydrogen is not going to do that.â
Long-term jobs are a perennial hope for any projects on the Nation, where unemployment runs high. Schiche said that there would be a lot of construction work while building the project, but âthe pipeline itself doesnât generate a lot of jobs.â He said those would be at two hydrogen production sites somewhere around Farmington â which is not on the reservation.
Keetso calls on bigger groups to fight alongside TĂł NizhĂłnĂ ĂnĂ against the hydrogen projects. She said, âI just wish big greens would get off the fence and say, âHey, this hydrogen may be the solution for some things. But the way that this company is doing it is wrong.ââ
Copyright 2024 Capital & Main
-
Latest NewsNovember 19, 2025How Employers and Labor Groups Are Trying to Protect Workers From ICE
-
Latest NewsNovember 18, 2025Future of Special Education at Risk, Teachers Say, as Trump Moves to Cut Staff and Programs
-
The SlickNovember 18, 2025After Years of Sparring, Gov. Shapiro Abandons Pennsylvania’s Landmark Climate Initiative Â
-
Latest NewsNovember 17, 2025In South L.A., Black and Latino Neighbors Unite Against ICE as Systems Fail
-
StrandedNovember 25, 2025âIâm Lost in This Countryâ: Non-Mexicans Living Undocumented After Deportation to Mexico
-
Column - State of InequalityNovember 21, 2025Seven Years Into Gov. Newsomâs Tenure, Californiaâs Housing Crisis Remains Unsolved
-
Column - State of InequalityNovember 28, 2025Santa Feâs Plan for a Real Minimum Wage Offers Lessons for Costly California
-
The SlickNovember 24, 2025California Endures Whipsaw Climate Extremes as Federal Support Withers

