2018 Election Results
Proposition 5: Real Estate Industry’s Tax-Break Measure Stopped in Its Tracks
The failure of this homeowners’ tax-break measure might have been predictable–its creators didn’t mount much of a campaign, and evidently left it for dead.

Proposition 5 sunk at the polls Tuesday night with a 57 percent No vote. It had gotten little notice in the recent welter of ballot propositions– even though it had everything to do with two California obsessions—taxes and housing.
Read More Election Coverage
State homeowners over 55, or who are disabled, are currently entitled to a onetime opportunity to transfer the property tax set by 1978’s Proposition 13 when they sell their home.
Prop. 5 would have expanded that tax break—making it transportable no matter how many moves and no matter the price of the new property. Someone wealthy enough to purchase beach-front property would still have artificially fixed low tax rates.
The California Realtors Association qualified Prop. 5 for the ballot and backed it with $13, 204,875—chump change in the world of California initiative politics.
Yes on Prop. 5 and No on Proposition 10 were prominent on the C.A.R website; spending on the soundly defeated Prop. 10, which would have expanded local governments’ ability to enact rent control, exceeded $45 million.
A California State Legislative Analyst’s report shows 85,000 homeowners 55 years or older sell property and move without extra tax enticements that drain state revenues and projected Prop. 5 would have drained $1 billion annually from schools and local government budgets.
Proponents tried to play the housing-shortage card, arguing that Prop. 5 would create more home ownership opportunities by increasing the sale of existing homes as previous owners move on.
“It would be a generous thing to say that Prop. 5 has anything to do with addressing the housing crisis,” Chris Hoene of the California Budget and Policy Center told Capital & Main. “The Realtors Association has tried to say that this will help with housing mobility but the economists and the housing experts agree that it won’t.”
Media representatives for Prop. 5 did not respond to requests for interview or to e-mailed questions.
But its failure might have been predictable–any campaign strategist will tell you it’s easier to get voters to mark “no” when confused or unsure. The industry itself didn’t mount much of a campaign, qualifying the measure but then evidently leaving it for dead to concentrate money on defeating Prop. 10.
A slew of editorials in papers from the Los Angeles Times to the San Francisco Chronicle to the San Jose Mercury News castigated Prop. 5 as bad policy.
Real estate interests evidently anticipated Prop. 5’s electoral failure—in October the Secretary of State’s office cleared a modified version of the 2018 model for circulation for the 2020 ballot. It’ll have company: A 2020 measure, potentially threatening to real estate interests, seeks to assess commercial and industrial property taxes at current market values rather than keeping them at low Proposition 13 levels.
Copyright Capital & Main

-
Latest NewsSeptember 24, 2025
Too Old to Keep Working, Not Enough Money to Stop
-
Latest NewsOctober 14, 2025
People in ICE Custody Face Invasive Strip Searches After Visits With Loved Ones
-
Column - State of InequalityOctober 9, 2025
California Joins New York in Trying to Fill a Void on Worker Protections
-
Column - State of InequalitySeptember 25, 2025
When Workers Unite, Even Disney Has to Listen
-
Latest NewsSeptember 26, 2025
Assault on Accessibility Initiatives Hits Early Career Scientists Hard
-
The SlickSeptember 29, 2025
Is the Sun Setting on Pennsylvania’s Solar Future?
-
Column - State of InequalityOctober 2, 2025
Deep-Blue California Is a National Leader in De Facto Public-School Segregation. Here’s Why…
-
Column - California UncoveredOctober 14, 2025
‘They Just Took You Away’