Labor & Economy
Walmart’s Bureaucratic Victory Can’t Mask Growing Opposition
If you’ve been following media coverage of the battle over Walmart’s proposed store in Chinatown, you probably have the impression that the fight is between the retail giant and labor. Chinatown leaders have been largely absent from press reports of the controversy, and to the extent they are mentioned one would think they want Walmart in their neighborhood.
Thursday’s hearing at the L.A. City Planning Commission should set the record straight — Chinatown doesn’t want Walmart, and residents and business owners are loud and clear about it for anyone who is paying attention.
The hearing was on the proposed Interim Control Ordinance (ICO) for Chinatown, which would temporarily stop chain stores over 20,000 square feet from opening in that community. By a vote of 14 to 0 the Council directed the Planning Department to draft the ordinance back in March, but staff dragged its feet for more than three months.
Indeed, the City Attorney and department staff informed me months ago that the ICO would be written within three to four weeks, and that City rules indicated that such ordinances go straight to Council without stopping at the Planning Commission.
And yet there we were for a vote we shouldn’t have been having, with staff telling the Commission to ignore the unanimous direction of the Council. To no one’s surprise the Commission deferred to staff and voted 5-2 not to support the ordinance. All this means, though, is that 10 votes rather than 8 are needed to pass the ICO in City Council, and I fully expect the 14 councilmembers who support this ordinance to vote for it when it comes before them.
For anyone wondering where the community stands on the issue, here’s the math:
- Walmart opponents outnumbered supporters more than 100-fold
- More than 25 people spoke against Walmart’s project, and only two for it
- One of the two Walmart supporters was the head of the Business Improvement District, and his own organization actually supports the ICO
- More than 80 businesses have signed a petition opposing Walmart
- More than 500 community members have signed petitions opposing Walmart and supporting the ICO
The speakers Thursday gave powerful personal testimony about their community, and the need to protect it from major chains that threaten to overwhelm family-owned businesses and destroy the neighborhood. Yesterday’s vote notwithstanding, the forces arrayed against Walmart are growing, and they aren’t just workers. In a few weeks we’ll get a chance to demonstrate that growing movement again. Let’s make sure our friends on the Council do a better job listening than the Planning Commission.
-
Column - State of InequalityApril 9, 2026Despite Apocalyptic Warnings, California Fast Food Wage Hike Didn’t Kill Jobs
-
The SlickApril 6, 2026Oil Companies Accused of Massive Accounting Fraud in New Mexico
-
Latest NewsApril 14, 2026ICE Has Arrested Dozens of Delivery Drivers at the Gates of a San Diego Military Base
-
Featured VideoApril 8, 2026As Shrinking Colorado River Imperils California Agriculture, Data Centers Seek More Water
-
Deadly Dust: The Silicosis EpidemicApril 13, 2026As Worker Silicosis Deaths Mount, GOP Moves to Shield Companies From Liability
-
The SlickApril 7, 2026As States Spend Millions to Woo Data Centers, Colorado Is Having a Reckoning
-
Latest NewsApril 8, 2026Will Americans Keep Paying a ‘Tariff Tax’?
-
Pain & ProfitApril 10, 2026U.S. Demand for Mining Concessions in Return for Health Funding Prompts Backlash

