Labor & Economy
Walmart’s Bureaucratic Victory Can’t Mask Growing Opposition
If you’ve been following media coverage of the battle over Walmart’s proposed store in Chinatown, you probably have the impression that the fight is between the retail giant and labor. Chinatown leaders have been largely absent from press reports of the controversy, and to the extent they are mentioned one would think they want Walmart in their neighborhood.
Thursday’s hearing at the L.A. City Planning Commission should set the record straight — Chinatown doesn’t want Walmart, and residents and business owners are loud and clear about it for anyone who is paying attention.
The hearing was on the proposed Interim Control Ordinance (ICO) for Chinatown, which would temporarily stop chain stores over 20,000 square feet from opening in that community. By a vote of 14 to 0 the Council directed the Planning Department to draft the ordinance back in March, but staff dragged its feet for more than three months.
Indeed, the City Attorney and department staff informed me months ago that the ICO would be written within three to four weeks, and that City rules indicated that such ordinances go straight to Council without stopping at the Planning Commission.
And yet there we were for a vote we shouldn’t have been having, with staff telling the Commission to ignore the unanimous direction of the Council. To no one’s surprise the Commission deferred to staff and voted 5-2 not to support the ordinance. All this means, though, is that 10 votes rather than 8 are needed to pass the ICO in City Council, and I fully expect the 14 councilmembers who support this ordinance to vote for it when it comes before them.
For anyone wondering where the community stands on the issue, here’s the math:
- Walmart opponents outnumbered supporters more than 100-fold
- More than 25 people spoke against Walmart’s project, and only two for it
- One of the two Walmart supporters was the head of the Business Improvement District, and his own organization actually supports the ICO
- More than 80 businesses have signed a petition opposing Walmart
- More than 500 community members have signed petitions opposing Walmart and supporting the ICO
The speakers Thursday gave powerful personal testimony about their community, and the need to protect it from major chains that threaten to overwhelm family-owned businesses and destroy the neighborhood. Yesterday’s vote notwithstanding, the forces arrayed against Walmart are growing, and they aren’t just workers. In a few weeks we’ll get a chance to demonstrate that growing movement again. Let’s make sure our friends on the Council do a better job listening than the Planning Commission.
-
The SlickNovember 14, 2025Can an Imperiled Frog Stop Oil Drilling Near Denver Suburbs? Residents Hope So.
-
Latest NewsNovember 11, 2025Photos, Video, Protests — Homeland Security Tightens Rule on Anti-ICE Activities
-
The SlickNovember 12, 2025Known for Its Oil, Texas Became a Renewable Energy Leader. Now It’s Being Unplugged.
-
Column - State of InequalityNovember 13, 2025Barring a Sharp Shift, Health Insurance Costs Will Skyrocket
-
Latest NewsNovember 19, 2025How Employers and Labor Groups Are Trying to Protect Workers From ICE
-
Latest NewsNovember 18, 2025Future of Special Education at Risk, Teachers Say, as Trump Moves to Cut Staff and Programs
-
Latest NewsNovember 17, 2025In South L.A., Black and Latino Neighbors Unite Against ICE as Systems Fail
-
The SlickNovember 18, 2025After Years of Sparring, Gov. Shapiro Abandons Pennsylvania’s Landmark Climate Initiative

