Labor & Economy
Waiter, There’s a Fly on My iPad!
The front page of the L.A. Times recently had a story about some hip restaurants replacing serving staff with iPads. First of all, L.A. Times: front page above the fold? Really?
Now, let’s set aside what the latest twist in automation says about us and our social interactions with other human beings. Instead, I want to focus on the fairly obvious economic implications. With apologies to Martin Niemöller:
First, they came for the bank tellers, and I said nothing, for I was not a bank teller.
Then they came for the travel agents, and I said nothing, for I was not a travel agent.
Then they came for the supermarket cashiers, and I said nothing, for I was not a supermarket cashier.
Then they came for the food service workers, and still I said nothing.
According to the L.A. County Economic Development Corporation, in 2010, there were an estimated 381,400 workers in L.A. County employed in the retail sector. Many of them got there after manufacturing in L.A. was decimated. But we’re going to be a service economy, so not to worry! Or so we were told. Obviously, this is now just one more thing for these workers to be worried about.
Look, I don’t want to be Mr. Sour-on-Everything. Obviously, hundreds of thousands of workers are not going to lose their jobs tomorrow. And in some sense, it’s a fool’s errand (as this will be depicted) to “stand in the way of progress.” Yet it’s one thing to be a buggy manufacturer railing against automobiles, and it’s something else altogether to point out that supposed progress will actually make our economy unsustainable.
One of the many things that capitalism is very, very good at is making us think about the atomized relationship between us and our transactions. The implications of those transactions for the larger economy are generally shielded from us. But the economy isn’t something that happens to us; it’s something that we create.
If we want to build a more sane and sustainable economy, there are two imperatives for our actions: One, we need to think carefully about our individual consumer decisions. (Do we go through the self-check-out aisle or do we deal with a cashier? Do we patronize establishments that generally provide good jobs with benefits?) And Two, we should establish policies that foster the kind of economy that we want to see, with incentives pushing in the right direction. Yes, the market will decide winners and losers, but the market is us.
-
State of InequalityApril 4, 2024
No, the New Minimum Wage Won’t Wreck the Fast Food Industry or the Economy
-
State of InequalityApril 18, 2024
Critical Audit of California’s Efforts to Reduce Homelessness Has Silver Linings
-
State of InequalityMarch 21, 2024
Nurses Union Says State Watchdog Does Not Adequately Investigate Staffing Crisis
-
Latest NewsApril 5, 2024
Economist Michael Reich on Why California Fast-Food Wages Can Rise Without Job Losses and Higher Prices
-
California UncoveredApril 19, 2024
Los Angeles’ Black Churches Join National Effort to Support Dementia Patients and Their Families
-
Latest NewsMarch 22, 2024
In Georgia, a Basic Income Program’s Success With Black Women Adds to Growing National Interest
-
Latest NewsApril 8, 2024
Report: Banks Should Set Stricter Climate Goals for Agriculture Clients
-
Striking BackMarch 25, 2024
Unionizing Planned Parenthood