2020 Elections
Proposition 15 Goes Down Swinging
Why did the Schools and Communities First initiative lose when other progressive measures passed in California?

The 2020 presidential election outcome was a nail-biter, but in California there was another drawn-out, high-stakes contest. On November 10, with more than 90% of the vote tabulated, the contest was called against Proposition 15, which was losing by 3.6 percentage points after a months-long campaign and a week-long ballot count.
Co-published by Patch
The Schools and Communities First initiative, Prop. 15, was launched by a coalition of community organizations, the Service Employees International Union’s California State Council and the California Teachers Association to create more resources for schools and local amenities by changing the commercial and industrial properties tax structure. (Disclosure: The two unions are financial supporters of this website.)
“The anti-15 people did as the pro-13 people did—they hit the right buttons. Tax increases, housing supply—all of that resonates with the California electorate.”
— Sherry Bebitch Jeffe
Prop. 15 would have reset the assessment of California corporate property tax rates that were established by 1978’s landmark Proposition 13, assessing them at present market value. Today most annual corporate property bills are based on rates that have gone un-reassessed for decades. With Prop. 15, Disney Studios’ million-plus-square-foot lot in Burbank would no longer be assessed at $5 and change per foot while some local businesses pay around $200 for the same space.
The California Legislative Analyst estimated that the Prop. 15 reform measure could have raised between $6.5 billion and $11.5 billion a year for local governments and schools. Why then, with a $56-million-plus campaign war chest, did it lose—especially when other progressive measures passed?
“The anti-15 people did as the pro-13 people did—they hit the right buttons,” says Sherry Bebitch Jeffe, a senior fellow at the University of Southern California’s Sol Price School of Public Policy. “Tax increases, housing supply—all of that resonates with the California electorate.”
Economic uncertainty triggered by the pandemic didn’t help. Nor did the fact that the opposition to Prop. 15 was funded by some of the world’s largest real estate groups and other business interests. The secretary of state’s website currently shows direct No on 15 fundraising at around $60 million, although much of the opposition money was raised indirectly, enabled by the California Business Roundtable political action committee. All of which allowed No on 15 to out-gun the Yes side’s messaging campaign, especially on television.
“CBRT was kind of the bundler of money,” says Anthony Thigpenn, founder of California Calls, one of the anchor organizations behind Prop. 15 and an instigator in pulling together a coalition 10 years ago to address inequitable public investment.
Thigpenn says the path forward would mean reversing public spending priorities that direct resources away from low-income communities — priorities that have created a tax structure that has left the lowest-income communities in California scrambling to fund schools.
He and the Prop. 15 coalition are analyzing next steps.
“[Prop. 15] is essentially about Prop. 13,” Thigpenn says. “But it’s broadly about empowering communities to have a voice and a power to enact policies to take care of their community needs.”
Copyright 2020 Capital & Main

-
Latest NewsAugust 11, 2025
Tracking the Chaos of Trump 2.0
-
Striking BackJuly 30, 2025
Private Equity in Hospice Care Spurs Workers to Strike
-
Column - State of InequalityAugust 7, 2025
Health Care CEO Warns of a System on the Brink
-
Latest NewsAugust 1, 2025
Border Patrol and ICE Agents Are Arresting U.S. Citizens in Immigration Raids
-
The SlickAugust 4, 2025
The Oil Wells Near the Denver Suburbs Worried Her. The Health Risk Alarmed Her Even More.
-
Column - State of InequalityAugust 15, 2025
Measles Is Making a Comeback — and California Isn’t Immune
-
The SlickJuly 29, 2025
The Reality of Trump’s ‘Beautiful Bill’: A Generation’s Worth of Damage
-
The SlickJuly 28, 2025
Trump Administration Moves to Cut Vital Petrochemical Watchdog, Putting Texans and Others at Risk