Labor & Economy
Privatizers Eye D.C. Transit Parking Deal
Two weeks ago, D.C.’s transit agency began taking bids from private companies to operate its parking facilities. In exchange for a big up-front payment, the winning company would collect fees from people parked at train stations for the next 50 years. Privatization would be foolish for a number of reasons.
D.C. Blue Line train. (Photo: Ben Schumin)
Public transit in Washington, D.C., is in rough shape. After years of safety issues, including several train collisions, the agency in charge, the Washington Metro Area Transit Authority (WMATA), is proposing to cut train service hours.
But another proposal may be even more troubling.
Two weeks ago, WMATA began taking bids from private companies to operate its parking facilities. In exchange for a big up-front payment to the agency, the winning company would collect fees from people parked at train stations for the next 50 years.
Privatization would be foolish for a number of reasons.
- It discourages public transit. In order for the private company to make a profit, parking rates will have to go up — as much as three percent a year, according to WMATA. If it costs more money to park and ride the train, people may look for other ways into the city.
- We lose control of assets we own. In a similar 75-year deal, Chicago handed over its parking meters in 2008 to banking giant Morgan Stanley for a one-time $1.2 billion payment. But that’s not all it handed over. The city is penalized if they do anything that cuts into Morgan Stanley’s profit, like adding bus or bike lanes. This makes it harder for Chicago to make innovative and environmentally sustainable changes to the city’s transit plan for the next seven decades.
- It’s short-term thinking. The parking facilities currently pull in nearly $50 million a year for WMATA. Privatization would send that money—and more—to a private company instead of the public. In Chicago, Morgan Stanley is on pace to make back its $1.2 billion upfront payment by 2020, with more than 60 years of meter money still to come.
The potential deal begs a fundamental question about public goods and services. Who do we want to control them? Us, or a small handful of investors and Wall Street banks?
The answer to that question is crucial, not only to D.C. public transit but also to the city itself. Journalist Erika Eichelberger recently summed up why: “As privatization undermines the very purpose and nature of a city, it also undermines the people’s connection to the city, and their desire to invest in and contribute to it.”
WMATA’s proposed plan is a big deal. We could lose the ability to have a say in transit parking policies for 50 years.
After decades of underfunding and neglect, D.C.’s public transit needs adequate and dedicated funding, not management by the lowest bidder.
This article is cross-posted at Huffington Post.
-
California UncoveredApril 9, 2024
700,000 Undocumented Californians Recently Became Eligible for Medi-Cal. Many May Be Afraid to Sign Up.
-
Feet to the FireApril 22, 2024
Regional U.S. Banks Sharply Expand Lending to Oil and Gas Projects
-
Class WarMarch 26, 2024
‘They Don’t Want to Teach Black History’
-
Latest NewsApril 10, 2024
The Transatlantic Battle to Stop Methane Gas Exports From South Texas
-
Latest NewsApril 23, 2024
A Whole-Person Approach to Combating Homelessness
-
Latest NewsMarch 27, 2024
Street Artists Say Graffiti on Abandoned L.A. High-Rises Is Disruptive, Divisive Art
-
State of InequalityApril 11, 2024
Dispelling the Stereotypes About California’s Low-Wage Workers
-
Latest NewsApril 24, 2024
An Author Reflects on the Effort to Rebuild L.A. After the ‘Violent Spring’ of 1992