Politics & Government
House Conservatives Block Food to Needy City Kids

Under the deceptively bland headline, “House GOP Releases Ag Budget,” the center-right Politico website on Monday examined a proposed House Republican budget for agriculture and food safety programs. After noting that the bill would give a measly $3 million increase to efforts to regulate the derivatives market ($62 million less than the Commodity Futures Trading Commission requested), writer David Rogers reported that the GOP measure would make it easier for schools to adopt lower nutritional standards for their meal programs — and for starch bombs like white potatoes to be included as vegetables that are covered by a Women, Infants and Children supplemental feeding program.
Only way down, in the story’s fourth paragraph, did Rogers mention that, “in a surprising twist,” the House Republicans required that a pilot program to feed school children from low-income families during summer vacation be restricted to kids living in rural Appalachia. In other words, urban children need not apply – this food program is only to help mostly white, mostly Republican families. And oh yes, the program will be cut from $85 million to $27 million.
This buried gold leaped out at editors at Talking Points Memo, however. On Wednesday, TPM congressional correspondent Sahil Kapur laid out the bill’s implications (including its racial coding) by interviewing anti-hunger advocates and policy makers.
“Kids are already under-served by the summer school program . . . there are not enough food programs for low-income children in rural and urban areas,” Kapur was told by Crystal FitzSimons, director of school programs at the nonprofit Food Research and Action Center .
An unnamed Democratic congressional aide was especially blunt about this part of the agriculture budget.
“It’s not clear to me if this was a fuck-up or if it was plainly mean-spirited or what happened,” the aid told Kapur. “But we’re going to work to change it.”
The day after the TPM article, Robert Schlesinger, an editor at the conservative U.S. News & World Report, conceded that the rural meal program was a “target” for Republicans, but assured everyone that “poor urban children will still eat.” Whew!
Schlesinger’s piece was accompanied by a photo of a lunch tray holding plates stacked with white rice, slices of white bread, lettuce leaves and some kind of gooey meat stuff parked a few inches away from a doughnut. Better than letting them eat cake, the picture seemed to suggest.

-
Striking BackApril 10, 2025
USC Follows Amazon and Musk’s SpaceX in Calling Labor Board Unconstitutional
-
Latest NewsApril 28, 2025
A Majority of Californians Support Affordable Health Care for Undocumented Immigrants, Polls Show
-
Latest NewsApril 11, 2025
California Showdown Over Medicaid as GOP Approves Massive Cuts
-
Column - California UncoveredMay 5, 2025
How Did Farmers Respond When the Trump Administration Suddenly Stopped Paying Them to Help Feed Needy Californians?
-
Column - State of InequalityApril 11, 2025
California State University’s Financial Aid Students Learn Chaos 101
-
The SlickApril 30, 2025
Fracking-Powered Crypto Mine in Pennsylvania Shuts Down Without Word to Regulators
-
The SlickApril 16, 2025
In Colorado, Gas for Cars Could Soon Come With a Warning Label
-
The SlickApril 21, 2025
The Trump Administration Climate Plan: Red States Get Hydrogen, Blue States Don’t