Labor & Economy
Gompers and Cato: A Dialogue

What do 19th century labor leader Samuel Gompers and the virulently anti-union think tank, the Cato Institute, have in common? More than you might imagine. They actually stare out at each other across Massachusetts Avenue in Washington, D.C. Or rather, the beautiful monument of Gompers and Gompers Square sit directly opposite Cato’s towering, modern offices, where the Koch brothers regularly plot strategy.
I discovered this humorous anomaly while moving into my temporary apartment around the corner, on 11th Street and Massachusetts Avenue, as I prepared to begin a three-month fellowship at Georgetown University — and a project that will look at ways to link to federal policy our efforts to build a new economy for all in Los Angeles. More on that later.
In memory of Gompers, I decided to create an imagined dialogue between the Cato Institute — now embroiled in an internal brouhaha involving the Brothers Koch – and their ever present bronze nemesis, Mr. Gompers. By the way, the following are real quotes from both Mr. Gompers (to be found here) and the Cato Institute (which can be located here, as well as here).
Cato: Collective bargaining is a misguided labor policy because it violates civil liberties and gives unions excessive power to block needed reforms. To provide policymakers with greater flexibility and to improve government efficiency, states should follow the lead of Virginia and ban collective bargaining in the public sector.
Gompers: Show me the country that has no strikes and I’ll show you the country in which there is no liberty.
Cato: Unions are rapidly becoming an economic anachronism. In recent decades, barriers to international trade and investment have fallen, and domestic markets, including transportation, energy and telecommunications, have been largely deregulated.
Gompers: The trade union movement represents the organized economic power of the workers… It is in reality the most potent and the most direct social insurance the workers can establish.
Cato: The weight of evidence indicates that, for most firms in most sectors, unionization leaves companies less able to compete successfully. The core problem is that unions cause compensation to rise faster than productivity, eroding profits while at the same time reducing the ability of firms to remain price-competitive. The result over time is that unionized firms have tended to lose market share to nonunionized firms, in domestic as well as international markets.
Gompers: The man who has his millions will want everything he can lay his hands on and then raise his voice against the poor devil who wants ten cents more a day.
So, think of Mr. Gompers looking out across Massachusetts Avenue, staring with intensely disapproving, steely eyes as the well-heeled stewards of capital plot to eliminate unions in America . . . Somehow, that gives me comfort.

-
Column - State of InequalityJuly 10, 2025
Will Covered California Land on Life Support?
-
Latest NewsJuly 8, 2025
When ICE Came Up Empty
-
Latest NewsJuly 9, 2025
Trump’s FEMA Proposals and Feud With Gavin Newsom Could Devastate California’s Disaster Response
-
Latest NewsJuly 11, 2025
Tortured by the Taliban, Locked Up in the U.S.
-
Striking BackJuly 30, 2025
Private Equity in Hospice Care Spurs Workers to Strike
-
Column - State of InequalityJuly 24, 2025
Reform Refill: Has Scott Wiener Convinced Gov. Newsom to Rein in Prescription Middlemen?
-
Striking BackJuly 18, 2025
Ford-Owned Battery Plant Drags Heels on Union Vote
-
The SlickJuly 21, 2025
On the Navajo Nation, the List of Mystery Wells Continues to Grow