Labor & Economy
Giving Small Businesses a Larger Voice

National Small Business Week is coming up in June, offering a good opportunity to contemplate what role small businesses play in both our cities and economy.
While most small businesses have a small workforce, cumulatively they provide a large percentage of the nation’s jobs. Many of the workers they hire are harder to employ, particularly in disadvantaged and immigrant communities. According to the U.S. Small Business Administration, “More than half of Americans either own or work for a small business, [which] create about two out of every three new jobs in the U.S. each year.” They also contribute to our local economies more than national or multinational corporations by keeping revenues in their local areas.
Companies like Walmart, Amazon and Target have come to dominate our commercial landscape, on the ground and virtually. These one-stop retailers can destroy their competition – mainly a wide variety of small businesses but also high-road large retailers – by taking a heavy-handed, profit-at-any-cost approach. For the stores’ neighborhoods, this can result in the depression of wages, replacement of long-time jobs with poverty-wage jobs and empty Main Streets. In particular, superstores are touted as an economic silver bullet that will bring jobs and increased revenues to cities. Based on this argument – with no real evidence to back it up – these retailers ask for expedited permits and taxpayer subsidies. But we need to ask ourselves, should we be handing over the keys to large corporations without really knowing what impact they will have and whether it will be better for communities?
Workers and small businesses have a shared interest in making sure development contributes to communities. We can create a climate where development moves forward while preserving good jobs and local, small businesses. AB 667, which was recently introduced in the California Assembly, would do just that. Modeled after similar legislation passed over 10 years ago in Los Angeles, the bill would require any superstore applying for permits in “economic assistance areas” or seeking public subsidies to conduct an “economic impact report” to measure effects on surrounding small businesses and existing employment. It would also require a public hearing after the report’s completion.
Local cities and municipalities would benefit from the tools and information this legislation would provide, allowing them to make decisions about major developments and spending millions of taxpayer dollars based on more than just vague promises. Stay tuned for updates on the bill.

-
Striking BackApril 10, 2025
USC Follows Amazon and Musk’s SpaceX in Calling Labor Board Unconstitutional
-
Latest NewsApril 28, 2025
A Majority of Californians Support Affordable Health Care for Undocumented Immigrants, Polls Show
-
Latest NewsApril 11, 2025
California Showdown Over Medicaid as GOP Approves Massive Cuts
-
Column - California UncoveredMay 5, 2025
How Did Farmers Respond When the Trump Administration Suddenly Stopped Paying Them to Help Feed Needy Californians?
-
The SlickApril 30, 2025
Fracking-Powered Crypto Mine in Pennsylvania Shuts Down Without Word to Regulators
-
Column - State of InequalityApril 11, 2025
California State University’s Financial Aid Students Learn Chaos 101
-
The SlickApril 16, 2025
In Colorado, Gas for Cars Could Soon Come With a Warning Label
-
The SlickApril 21, 2025
The Trump Administration Climate Plan: Red States Get Hydrogen, Blue States Don’t