Environment
Flame Retardant Bill Clears Assembly Hurdle
California Senate Bill 1019 (Mark Leno, D-San Francisco) passed the state Assembly’s Committee on Business, Professions and Consumer Protection by a 10-2 vote Tuesday. This was the second test in the Assembly of the measure, which would compel manufacturers of upholstered furniture to disclose on product tags if an item being sold contains flame-retardant chemicals.
In an investigative feature published the same day by Capital & Main, reporter Gary Cohn explored the connections between the chemicals and carcinogens, decreased fertility, hormone disruption and lower IQ development. In Cohn’s story, two California firefighters who had survived cancer stated they believed their cancers resulted from exposure to the flame retardants, which release toxic fumes when exposed to flame.
Leno’s bill, which received the endorsement of the Sacramento Bee Sunday, has gathered support from the Republican sides of the Senate and Assembly aisles. It must now face debate and an August vote in the Assembly’s Appropriations Committee, where it is expected to meet intense opposition lobbying from both the chemical industry and furniture manufacturers.
“It’s very simply a free-market, consumer-choice piece of legislation,” says Leno.
-
Column - State of InequalityMay 21, 2026In California Governor’s Race, Xavier Becerra Walks Away From Single-Payer
-
Deadly Dust: The Silicosis EpidemicMay 6, 2026California Could Be the First State to Ban Quartz Countertops
-
Latest NewsMay 5, 2026Fire Recovery Could Wipe Out Altadena’s Affordable Rentals
-
Latest NewsMay 11, 2026Inside the Texas Water Crisis Pitting Residents Against Industry
-
Column - State of InequalityMay 7, 2026California Lawmaker Proposes Fix to Blunt Loss of Food and Health Aid
-
Latest NewsMay 8, 2026Salvadoran Man Says He Suffered Stroke While Awaiting Deportation to Torture Prison
-
Featured VideoMay 8, 2026The Lung Disease That’s Killing California Stonecutters
-
Latest NewsMay 15, 2026California Hazardous Waste Rules Criticized as Years Late and ‘Polluter-Friendly’

