Judging Janus
Breaking News: Supreme Court Rules Against Unions in ‘Janus’
Led by Associate Justice Samuel Alito, the five-member majority issued a decision that is the culmination of a multi-year effort that has its roots in right-wing judicial organizations, foundations and think tanks.
Today’s U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Janus v. AFSCME should surprise no one who has been watching its conservative justices’ crusade to undermine the influence of American unions — and the political causes they support. Led by Samuel Alito, the five-member majority issued a decision that is the culmination of a multi-year effort that has its roots in right-wing judicial organizations, foundations and think tanks. These entities correctly determined that the long-term political success of the right would be immeasurably enhanced if unions representing government workers could be weakened.
That’s exactly what the high court’s ruling will do, though the full extent of the damage won’t be known for years, and will depend on the tenacity and creativity of the response by unions and their allies. What we do know is this: A 41-year-old precedent has fallen, one that required workers who decline union membership but nevertheless benefit from collective bargaining agreements to pay “fair share” fees to the unions that negotiate these contracts.
Later today, labor law professor Charlotte Garden will tell Capital & Main readers what the ruling says about the politicization of American jurisprudence, and what lies ahead for public sector unions.
For a deeper understanding of the lead-up to today’s decision, visit Capital & Main’s special section on Janus v. AFSCME.
Copyright Capital & Main
Students Claim Concord School Uses Excessive Physical Restraint
Killed Bill: What’s Next for California’s Housing Crisis?
L.A. Charters Suspend Black and Disabled Students at Higher Rates
Jackie Goldberg Explains the Coming War to Save Public Education
Report: Many Schools Lack Funds to Protect LGBTQ Students
Lead Dust Closes Bay Area Gun Range and Kids’ Gymnastics Center
L.A. Charters Suspend Black and Disabled Students at Higher Rates
Jackie Goldberg Explains the Coming War to Save Public Education
Two Communities Fight Against “Carpetbagger” Charter School
Will Regulators Ban a Potentially “Catastrophic” Refinery Chemical?
Is Trump’s Immigration Crackdown Killing the California Dream?
Central Valley Drains Away
L.A. Teachers Strike Diary: Day Five
L.A. Teachers Strike Diary: Day Four
L.A. Teachers Strike Diary: Day Three
-
Breaking NewsMay 4, 2019Lead Dust Closes Bay Area Gun Range and Kids’ Gymnastics Center
-
Grading Charter SchoolsMay 22, 2019L.A. Charters Suspend Black and Disabled Students at Higher Rates
-
EducationMay 17, 2019Jackie Goldberg Explains the Coming War to Save Public Education
-
Grading Charter SchoolsApril 30, 2019Two Communities Fight Against “Carpetbagger” Charter School
-
EnvironmentMay 8, 2019Will Regulators Ban a Potentially “Catastrophic” Refinery Chemical?
-
Labor & EconomyApril 29, 2019Rent Law Offers Reprieve to Some of Los Angeles’ Most Vulnerable Families
-
Learning CurvesApril 25, 2019Elizabeth Warren’s Plan to Erase Student Debt
-
The Golden State of HateMay 2, 2019Why Californians Love to Hate