Labor & Economy
A Privatized Medicaid Nightmare
In April, when Iowa governor Terry Branstad handed over the state’s Medicaid program to private insurance companies, many questioned his motives. Recent large-scale transitions to privatized Medicaid in states like Florida and Kansas haven’t fared well.
Four months is all it took.
In April, when Iowa governor Terry Branstad handed over the state’s Medicaid program to private insurance companies, many questioned his motives. Recent large-scale transitions to privatized Medicaid in states like Florida and Kansas haven’t fared well. The Des Moines Register warned, “The health care of a half million people and $4 billion in public money are at stake.”
Now, just four months later, billing problems are piling up.
Hundreds of Iowa’s Medicaid providers say the insurance companies aren’t paying them on time. For many, administrative costs have gone up. The privatized program, which Branstad claimed would “modernize” care, is actually making it harder for many doctors, hospitals, clinics and nonprofits to provide care.
A state senator says the program is in “a state of emergency.” If providers continue to go unpaid, many may be forced to stop taking Medicaid patients or to close their doors all together.
By handing over control of Medicaid to corporations, Branstad has jeopardized the jobs of thousands of providers and the health of nearly 600,000 elderly, disabled, and poor Iowans—22 percent of the state’s population.
So why is this even happening? Branstad should’ve known that allowing corporations to profit from the only source of health care available to the state’s most vulnerable wouldn’t add up. If he had simply looked southwest a few hundred miles, to Kansas, he would’ve seen that privatizing Medicaid there has led to rising costs and reduced care.
The Register recently hit the nail on the head by observing, “Elected officials who are loathe to raise taxes to pay for the increased cost of public services can always find someone who claims they can do the job for less money while still generating a profit.”
Instead of investing in Medicaid, Branstad chose to follow the “smaller government” playbook, which says privatization saves taxpayers money. But it’s pretty clear what privatization is really about. By weakening democratic public control over a vital public good, the already vulnerable are at risk of being pushed further to the margins.
Later this year, we at In the Public Interest are releasing a report on the ways in which the decades-long experiment of privatizing public goods and services has helped fuel America’s recent historic inequality. From Medicaid to public transit, education and water, privatization often hurts those who need public goods the most. We hope the report helps us work together to restore the very sense of “community” that sustains a healthy and equitable society.
Quality public goods and services are a must-have in such a society. They should be controlled by us, not corporations.
-
Latest NewsMarch 20, 2026Is Kaiser’s Labor-Management Model Unraveling?
-
Column - California UncoveredMarch 16, 2026From Invisibility to Inclusion: A ‘Generational Shift’ on Menopause Care
-
Column - State of InequalityMarch 19, 2026More States Are Taxing the Ultra-Rich — Washington Is the Latest
-
Latest NewsMarch 24, 2026It’s Getting Tougher to Teach LGBTQ History, Even Where It’s Required by Law
-
Latest NewsMarch 17, 2026The Video That Changed the Narrative of a Fatal Beating on the Border
-
Imperial DivideApril 1, 2026Newsom Promised California a Lithium Bonanza. It Still Hasn’t Arrived.
-
Latest NewsMarch 25, 2026Capital & Main Wins Five Best in Business Awards from National Journalism Contest
-
Column - State of InequalityMarch 26, 2026The Least-Bad Option: A County Sales Tax to Save California Health Clinics

