Labor & Economy
Waiter, There’s a Fly on My iPad!
Photo: Wikipedia
The front page of the L.A. Times recently had a story about some hip restaurants replacing serving staff with iPads. First of all, L.A. Times: front page above the fold? Really?
Now, let’s set aside what the latest twist in automation says about us and our social interactions with other human beings. Instead, I want to focus on the fairly obvious economic implications. With apologies to Martin Niemöller:
First, they came for the bank tellers, and I said nothing, for I was not a bank teller.
Then they came for the travel agents, and I said nothing, for I was not a travel agent.
Then they came for the supermarket cashiers, and I said nothing, for I was not a supermarket cashier.
Then they came for the food service workers, and still I said nothing.
According to the L.A. County Economic Development Corporation, in 2010, there were an estimated 381,400 workers in L.A. County employed in the retail sector. Many of them got there after manufacturing in L.A. was decimated. But we’re going to be a service economy, so not to worry! Or so we were told. Obviously, this is now just one more thing for these workers to be worried about.
Look, I don’t want to be Mr. Sour-on-Everything. Obviously, hundreds of thousands of workers are not going to lose their jobs tomorrow. And in some sense, it’s a fool’s errand (as this will be depicted) to “stand in the way of progress.” Yet it’s one thing to be a buggy manufacturer railing against automobiles, and it’s something else altogether to point out that supposed progress will actually make our economy unsustainable.
One of the many things that capitalism is very, very good at is making us think about the atomized relationship between us and our transactions. The implications of those transactions for the larger economy are generally shielded from us. But the economy isn’t something that happens to us; it’s something that we create.
If we want to build a more sane and sustainable economy, there are two imperatives for our actions: One, we need to think carefully about our individual consumer decisions. (Do we go through the self-check-out aisle or do we deal with a cashier? Do we patronize establishments that generally provide good jobs with benefits?) And Two, we should establish policies that foster the kind of economy that we want to see, with incentives pushing in the right direction. Yes, the market will decide winners and losers, but the market is us.
-
Column - State of InequalityMay 21, 2026In California Governor’s Race, Xavier Becerra Walks Away From Single-Payer
-
Deadly Dust: The Silicosis EpidemicMay 6, 2026California Could Be the First State to Ban Quartz Countertops
-
The SlickApril 29, 2026With Promises of Money, Controversial Gas Pipeline on Navajo Nation Passes First Hurdle
-
Latest NewsMay 1, 2026In One of L.A.’s Food Deserts, ‘Hands That Harmed Are Now Hands That Heal’
-
Column - State of InequalityApril 30, 2026Don’t Call It Upward Mobility If People Still Can’t Afford to Live
-
Latest NewsMay 5, 2026Fire Recovery Could Wipe Out Altadena’s Affordable Rentals
-
Latest NewsMay 11, 2026Inside the Texas Water Crisis Pitting Residents Against Industry
-
Column - State of InequalityMay 7, 2026California Lawmaker Proposes Fix to Blunt Loss of Food and Health Aid

