Labor & Economy
Walmart’s Bureaucratic Victory Can’t Mask Growing Opposition
If you’ve been following media coverage of the battle over Walmart’s proposed store in Chinatown, you probably have the impression that the fight is between the retail giant and labor. Chinatown leaders have been largely absent from press reports of the controversy, and to the extent they are mentioned one would think they want Walmart in their neighborhood.
Thursday’s hearing at the L.A. City Planning Commission should set the record straight — Chinatown doesn’t want Walmart, and residents and business owners are loud and clear about it for anyone who is paying attention.
The hearing was on the proposed Interim Control Ordinance (ICO) for Chinatown, which would temporarily stop chain stores over 20,000 square feet from opening in that community. By a vote of 14 to 0 the Council directed the Planning Department to draft the ordinance back in March, but staff dragged its feet for more than three months.
Indeed, the City Attorney and department staff informed me months ago that the ICO would be written within three to four weeks, and that City rules indicated that such ordinances go straight to Council without stopping at the Planning Commission.
And yet there we were for a vote we shouldn’t have been having, with staff telling the Commission to ignore the unanimous direction of the Council. To no one’s surprise the Commission deferred to staff and voted 5-2 not to support the ordinance. All this means, though, is that 10 votes rather than 8 are needed to pass the ICO in City Council, and I fully expect the 14 councilmembers who support this ordinance to vote for it when it comes before them.
For anyone wondering where the community stands on the issue, here’s the math:
- Walmart opponents outnumbered supporters more than 100-fold
- More than 25 people spoke against Walmart’s project, and only two for it
- One of the two Walmart supporters was the head of the Business Improvement District, and his own organization actually supports the ICO
- More than 80 businesses have signed a petition opposing Walmart
- More than 500 community members have signed petitions opposing Walmart and supporting the ICO
The speakers Thursday gave powerful personal testimony about their community, and the need to protect it from major chains that threaten to overwhelm family-owned businesses and destroy the neighborhood. Yesterday’s vote notwithstanding, the forces arrayed against Walmart are growing, and they aren’t just workers. In a few weeks we’ll get a chance to demonstrate that growing movement again. Let’s make sure our friends on the Council do a better job listening than the Planning Commission.
-
State of InequalityApril 4, 2024
No, the New Minimum Wage Won’t Wreck the Fast Food Industry or the Economy
-
State of InequalityApril 18, 2024
Critical Audit of California’s Efforts to Reduce Homelessness Has Silver Linings
-
State of InequalityMarch 21, 2024
Nurses Union Says State Watchdog Does Not Adequately Investigate Staffing Crisis
-
Latest NewsApril 5, 2024
Economist Michael Reich on Why California Fast-Food Wages Can Rise Without Job Losses and Higher Prices
-
California UncoveredApril 19, 2024
Los Angeles’ Black Churches Join National Effort to Support Dementia Patients and Their Families
-
Latest NewsMarch 22, 2024
In Georgia, a Basic Income Program’s Success With Black Women Adds to Growing National Interest
-
Latest NewsApril 8, 2024
Report: Banks Should Set Stricter Climate Goals for Agriculture Clients
-
Striking BackMarch 25, 2024
Unionizing Planned Parenthood